Loading...

We've detected that your browser language is Chinese. Would you like to visit our Chinese website? [ Dismiss ]
By: Emma

How We Evaluated These Enterprise File Sharing Solutions

A file sharing platform can look strong on features but still create problems during deployment, administration, or recovery. To compare enterprise file sharing solutions fairly, we evaluated each one across four areas that shape day-to-day enterprise use.

  • Deployment flexibility: We considered whether a platform supports cloud, on-premises, hybrid, or other deployment models, and how that model affects infrastructure control and integration.

  • Security and compliance depth: We looked at controls such as encryption, access policies, audit logging, and compliance capabilities. Security features matter most when they can be applied consistently across users, devices, and shared data.

  • Identity and admin control: Enterprise file sharing requires more than user accounts. Centralized administration, identity integration, permissions, and visibility into file activity affect how easily a team manages the platform at scale.

  • Total cost beyond licensing: Subscription or license fees are only part of the cost. Teams should also account for storage, migration, integrations, support, and the operational work required to maintain access and security policies.

These criteria give a consistent basis for comparing cloud, on-premises, and hybrid platforms in the sections below.

10+ Enterprise File Sharing Solutions at a Glance

The platforms below serve different file access and collaboration needs. Deployment model, security controls, and operational tradeoffs can vary significantly, so the table is intended as a starting point rather than a feature-by-feature specification.

Solution Deployment Best For
Microsoft OneDrive Cloud Individual file sync
Microsoft SharePoint Cloud, on‑premises Team document libraries
i2Share On‑premises (Linux‑based server) Ransomware‑resilient file sharing
Box Cloud Cross‑team collaboration
Egnyte Cloud, hybrid Hybrid file access
FileCloud Cloud, on‑premises, hybrid On‑premises control
Citrix ShareFile Cloud, on‑premises, hybrid Client‑facing sharing
GoAnywhere MFT On‑premises, cloud, hybrid Automated transfers
Tresorit Cloud End‑to‑end encryption
Intralinks VIA Cloud Secure deal collaboration
Dropbox Business Cloud Simple file sharing and collaboration
Nextcloud Self‑hosted, hosted Open‑source file sharing

The table also highlights an important distinction: not every product here is built around the same workflow. OneDrive and SharePoint are closely tied to Microsoft 365 collaboration, while GoAnywhere MFT focuses on managed transfers and Intralinks VIA targets secure deal collaboration.

For IT teams, the right comparison starts with how files are accessed, shared, governed, and recovered, not with storage capacity alone.

1. Microsoft OneDrive: Best for Individual File Sync

Microsoft OneDrive is a cloud file storage and synchronization service designed around each user’s individual work files, with sharing and collaboration features layered on top. In Microsoft 365 environments, users can access OneDrive through the web, mobile apps, and the OneDrive sync app on Windows or macOS.

onedrive business homepage

  • Familiar file sync: The OneDrive sync app lets users work with cloud files directly from File Explorer or Finder. Files On-Demand can keep files online-only until they are needed, which reduces local storage usage.

  • Flexible sharing: Users can share individual files or folders with specific people or through configurable links. Administrators can also control external sharing and sync behavior through Microsoft 365 administration settings.

  • Strong Microsoft 365 integration: OneDrive fits naturally into a Microsoft 365 environment and works alongside SharePoint and Teams for a connected file experience.

Limitation: OneDrive works best as personal cloud storage rather than a shared team library. Files that belong to a department or project team fit more naturally in a SharePoint document library, which is built for shared ownership and collaboration.

2. Microsoft SharePoint: Best for Team Document Libraries

Microsoft SharePoint is a collaboration and content management platform built around shared sites and document libraries, giving teams a central, structured location for project files and business content.

microsoft sharepoint homepage

  • Shared document ownership: SharePoint document libraries provide a central location where team members can create, upload, edit, organize, and share files. This makes SharePoint a good fit for project files, department documents, and other content that needs shared access rather than individual ownership.

  • Granular access control: File and folder sharing can be configured with different permission levels, while administrators and site owners manage access for internal and external users. This gives IT teams more control over how sensitive business content is shared.

  • Versioning and recovery: SharePoint document libraries support version history, allowing teams to track changes and restore earlier versions. Microsoft 365 also provides configurable version history limits, which can help administrators balance recovery needs with storage management.

Limitation: SharePoint can become complex as sites, libraries, permissions, sharing rules, and versioning policies grow. Teams need a clear information architecture and permission model to keep shared content easy to manage and find.

3. i2Share: Best for Ransomware-Resilient File Sharing

Most enterprise file sharing platforms handle storage and collaboration, but leave ransomware recovery to a separate backup product. i2Share builds recovery directly into the sharing platform, so teams can roll back infected or corrupted files without deploying additional software.

i2Share log in page

FREE Trial for 60-Day
  • Built-in ransomware recovery: i2Share uses CDP (continuous data protection) rollback and automated backups to protect shared documents. If ransomware encrypts or corrupts files, teams can recover affected files or directories within minutes, rather than restoring from a separate backup system.

  • Layered file-level security: Every shared file is protected with end-to-end encryption, and i2Share integrates anti-virus scanning to isolate suspicious files before they spread. Two-factor authentication adds another layer of protection against unauthorized account access.

  • Controlled sharing workflow: Access to shared files runs through granular access controls and permission approval workflows, with validity controls that limit how long shared content stays accessible. Auto-lock during concurrent editing also prevents version conflicts when multiple users work in the same document.

Limitation: Server-side deployment supports Linux only (CentOS, RedHat, Kylin OS V10). Desktop and mobile clients cover Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS.

4. Box: Best for Cross-Team Collaboration

Box is a cloud content management and file sharing platform designed for collaboration across teams, departments, and external partners. It supports both persistent folder-based collaboration and shared links, with administrators able to control permissions, external collaboration, authentication, and other security settings.

box file sharing

  • Flexible collaboration: Teams can invite users to shared folders for ongoing collaboration or use shared links when they only need to provide access to specific files or folders. Different collaborator roles let administrators control what users can view, upload, edit, or manage.

  • Granular sharing controls: Box administrators can restrict external collaboration, limit who can invite collaborators, control shared-link permissions, and apply domain allowlists. These controls help when teams regularly exchange files with customers, partners, or other external users.

  • Enterprise security controls: Box provides administrative controls for SSO, MFA, device security, content protection, and threat detection. Higher-tier plans add data classification, DLP, and content lifecycle management through Box Shield.

Limitation: Box is cloud-only, with no on-premises deployment option. Larger teams also need clear rules for folder ownership and external collaboration to keep access consistent as sharing scales.

5. Egnyte: Best for Hybrid Deployment

Egnyte is an enterprise file sharing and content management platform that combines cloud-based file access with on-premises storage through its hybrid architecture.

Its Storage Sync and Smart Cache technologies sync or cache files between local storage and Egnyte Cloud, which suits teams that need both centralized cloud access and fast local file availability.

egnyte homepage

  • Hybrid file access: Egnyte connects local storage devices with its cloud platform, so users can access and share files across locations. Its hybrid deployment can also provide local repositories for offices that need faster access to frequently used files.

  • Centralized security and governance: Administrators can manage permissions across connected content sources and apply controls for external sharing, sensitive data, retention, and access monitoring. Egnyte also includes ransomware detection and snapshot-based recovery as part of its security framework.

  • Support for distributed teams: Users can access files through web, desktop, and mobile clients, while local caching or synchronization supports offices with different connectivity and performance needs.

Limitation: Hybrid deployment adds infrastructure and administration requirements. Teams need to plan the local storage, synchronization, caching, and connectivity architecture rather than treating Egnyte as a cloud-only file sharing service.

6. FileCloud: Best for On-Premises Control

FileCloud is an enterprise file sync and sharing platform that supports self-hosted, cloud, and hybrid deployments. Its self-hosted option can run within a company’s own infrastructure and integrate with existing file servers, Active Directory, and NTFS permissions.

Hero banner for FileCloud:'Hyper-secure Content Collaboration. Simplified.' with five feature icons and captions below the headline

  • Strong deployment control: FileCloud Server can be deployed on premises or in a private cloud, while its hybrid model can connect local storage with cloud infrastructure. This gives IT teams more control over where business files are stored and processed.

  • Integration with existing file infrastructure: FileCloud integrates with Active Directory and existing Windows file servers while preserving NTFS permissions. This can reduce disruption when modernizing an established file-sharing environment.

  • Enterprise security controls: FileCloud supports encryption, two-factor authentication, SSO, audit trails, granular permissions, antivirus scanning, and ransomware protection. Its sharing controls also include password protection and expiration settings for shared links.

Limitation: Self-hosted deployment puts more responsibility on the IT team. Infrastructure, upgrades, identity integration, storage, availability, and security operations need to be planned and maintained alongside the file-sharing platform.

7. ShareFile: Best for Client-Facing Sharing

ShareFile is an enterprise file sharing and document workflow platform designed for secure exchanges between internal teams and external clients, vendors, and partners.

Its client-facing features combine secure file sharing with document requests, approvals, e-signatures, and activity tracking.

sharefile homepage

  • Client-facing workflows: ShareFile provides client portals where external users can upload files, review documents, respond to requests, and complete signatures. This can replace fragmented email attachments when file exchange is part of a larger client workflow.

  • Granular sharing controls: Administrators can control who can view, share, edit, or download files, while shared links can require sign-in and include access expiration settings. Activity logs also provide visibility into file access and sharing activity.

  • Security for sensitive exchanges: ShareFile supports encrypted file transfers and stored-file encryption, along with authentication and device security controls. Administrators can also apply restrictions to external sharing and user access.

Limitation: ShareFile is particularly focused on controlled document exchange and client workflows. Teams looking primarily for a general-purpose internal file sync platform may find some of its workflow and governance capabilities more than they need.

8. GoAnywhere MFT: Best for Automated Transfers

GoAnywhere MFT is a managed file transfer platform built to secure, automate, and audit file exchanges between systems, applications, employees, and external trading partners.

It supports protocols such as SFTP, FTPS, AS2, and HTTPS, along with scheduled and multi-step workflows for recurring transfers.

goanywhere mft homepage

  • Automated file transfers: IT teams can build multi-step workflows to transfer, encrypt, process, and schedule files without relying on separate scripts for each process. File monitors can also trigger workflows when files are added, modified, or deleted.

  • Controlled B2B exchange: GoAnywhere provides secure file servers and folders for customers, employees, and trading partners. Granular folder permissions, authentication options, encryption, and detailed audit trails help control and track file movement.

  • Centralized administration: Transfers across remote systems and cloud environments can be managed from a central deployment. GoAnywhere also supports cloud connectors for services such as SharePoint, Box, Dropbox, and Google Drive.

Limitation: GoAnywhere MFT is built primarily for managed file transfer rather than everyday collaborative file management. Teams that need shared workspaces, document collaboration, and general-purpose file synchronization may need a separate platform alongside MFT.

9. Tresorit: Best for End-to-End Encryption

Tresorit is a cloud file sharing and collaboration platform built around client-side end-to-end encryption and a zero-knowledge architecture. Files are encrypted on the user’s device before upload, and Tresorit does not receive the encryption keys needed to decrypt the content.

tresorit homepage

  • Strong data confidentiality: Files are encrypted before they leave the user’s device, and encryption keys remain under user control. This prevents the service provider from accessing readable file contents.

  • Secure collaboration: Tresorit maintains its encryption model when files are shared with other users. Access can be granted to specific recipients and revoked when necessary, while shared content stays encrypted.

  • Enterprise identity integration: Tresorit supports SSO with identity providers including Microsoft Azure AD, Google Workspace, and Okta. This lets businesses use existing identity credentials and centralized authentication policies.

Limitation: Zero-knowledge encryption also changes the recovery model. Tresorit cannot recover a forgotten password when the user is not signed in on another device, though Business subscriptions with Advanced Control provide additional recovery options. Teams should build account and key recovery procedures into their deployment plan.

10. Intralinks VIA: Best for Secure Deal Collaboration

Intralinks VIA is a cloud-based secure collaboration platform designed for sharing sensitive business content with internal teams and external stakeholders. Its structured workspaces, granular permissions, and activity reporting make it suitable for projects where document access needs tighter control than a general-purpose file sharing service.

intralinks via homepage

  • Controlled external collaboration: Intralinks VIA supports project-based workspaces for internal teams, clients, partners, and other external stakeholders. Administrators can manage users, workspaces, and permissions from a centralized interface.

  • Detailed document controls: Intralinks VIA offers document-level permissions for activities such as viewing, downloading, editing, and printing. Its IRM capabilities can also maintain access controls on protected copies after files are downloaded.

  • Activity visibility: Administrators can monitor document and folder activity, including uploads, views, edits, deletions, downloads, workspace access, and authentication activity. This gives a clearer audit trail for sensitive collaboration.

Limitation: VIA is more specialized than a general-purpose enterprise file sharing platform. Teams that primarily need everyday internal file synchronization may find its project and governance model more than they need.

11. Dropbox Business: Best for Simplicity

Dropbox Business provides cloud-based file synchronization, sharing, and collaboration through desktop, web, and mobile clients.

Its team folders, shared folders, and centralized administration make it suitable for businesses that want a familiar file-sharing experience without building a more specialized content management environment.

dropbox business homepage

  • Simple team collaboration: Team folders provide shared spaces for groups, while shared folders support more focused collaboration with selected users. Permissions can distinguish between editors and viewers.

  • Straightforward administration: Admins can control external sharing, manage team membership, configure sharing permissions, and monitor team activity from the administration console. Dropbox manages identity through Microsoft Entra ID, after retiring its older Active Directory connector.

  • Established security controls: Dropbox encrypts files in transit and at rest, and offers end-to-end encrypted team folders with customer-managed keys on Advanced, Business Plus, and Enterprise plans.

Limitation: Simple file sharing can become harder to govern as teams, folders, external collaborators, and exceptions grow. Administrators need clear rules for team folders, external sharing, and restricted access to prevent permission structures from becoming difficult to maintain.

12. Nextcloud: Best Open-Source Option

Nextcloud is an open-source file sync and sharing platform that can be self-hosted on infrastructure controlled by the IT team.

It supports file sharing, external storage, access controls, auditing, and multiple encryption methods, giving teams significant control over where data is stored and how access is managed.

nextcloud homepage

  • Self-hosted control: Teams can deploy Nextcloud on their own infrastructure or connect external storage systems such as Windows Network Drive, SharePoint, and other supported platforms. This lets IT teams keep control over storage location and infrastructure.

  • Flexible access policies: Nextcloud provides granular sharing permissions and rule-based File Access Control. Administrators can restrict access based on factors such as user groups, IP addresses, file types, and other conditions.

  • Multiple encryption options: Nextcloud supports server-side encryption as well as client-side end-to-end encryption for selected folders. Its end-to-end encryption model is designed so the server cannot read protected file contents, while audit logging and optional recovery mechanisms support enterprise administration.

Limitation: Self-hosting shifts more operational responsibility to the deployment team. Updates, hardening, identity management, storage, encryption keys, monitoring, and backup planning all need to be managed as part of the overall platform.

File Sharing Is Not Backup: What Enterprises Still Need

File sharing platforms make business files easier to access, synchronize, and collaborate on, but these capabilities do not automatically provide a complete backup strategy. Version history, recycle bins, snapshots, or platform-level recovery can help with some incidents, but enterprises still need to consider independent recovery points and protection against destructive events.

Sync ≠ Backup

File synchronization keeps files consistent across devices or locations. If a user deletes or overwrites a file and that change synchronizes across connected systems, synchronization can also distribute the unwanted change.

Backup works differently by maintaining separate recovery points that can be used to restore data to an earlier state. This distinction becomes important when the original data is encrypted, corrupted, accidentally deleted, or otherwise compromised.

Ransomware and Accidental-Deletion Exposure

Ransomware can encrypt or corrupt files that are accessible through file-sharing platforms. Accidental deletion and malicious file changes create similar recovery requirements, even when no malware is involved. NIST recommends protecting and testing backups so they remain usable after data loss events.

A file-sharing platform may provide built-in recovery features, but IT teams should also consider whether recovery points are isolated from the production environment and protected against unauthorized deletion or modification. Microsoft, for example, recommends protecting backups against deliberate erasure and encryption and regularly testing recovery.

Data Recovery Requirements

Before choosing a file sharing solution, define what needs to be recoverable and how quickly it needs to return to service. Useful questions include:

  • How far back can the team recover a deleted or corrupted file?
  • Can administrators restore individual files without restoring an entire dataset?
  • Are recovery points protected from modification or deletion?
  • Can data be restored to an alternate location?
  • How long are recovery points retained?
  • Can the recovery process meet the required RPO and RTO?
  • Are backup copies stored separately from the production file-sharing environment?

These questions help distinguish collaboration features from actual data protection. A platform can provide excellent file sharing while still requiring a separate backup system for long-term recovery and ransomware resilience.

Independent Backup and Recovery with i2Backup

i2Backup provides centralized backup and recovery for structured and unstructured data across physical, virtualized, and multi-cloud environments. Its documentation states that WORM-compliant storage can make backups immutable, while encryption during transmission and access controls protect backup data.

For unstructured data, i2Backup supports full, incremental, and incremental-forever backup modes, along with file-level restoration to the original or an alternate location. It also supports multiple restore points and point-in-time recovery for accidental deletion or data corruption scenarios.

The practical takeaway is simple: use file sharing for access and collaboration, and design a separate backup layer for recovery. Keeping those roles distinct can reduce the risk that a file-sharing incident also removes the ability to recover the affected data.

FAQs

Q1: What does EFSS mean?

EFSS stands for enterprise file sync and share. It refers to platforms built for businesses to store, sync, and share files with permission controls and admin oversight.

 

Q2: Is cloud file sharing safe for sensitive business data?

Yes, when the platform uses encryption, access controls, and compliance certifications suited to the data type. The bigger risk usually comes from misconfigured sharing settings, not the cloud itself.

 

Q3: Do businesses still need MFT if they already use EFSS?

Often yes. EFSS handles day-to-day collaboration, while MFT handles automated, scheduled file exchanges with partners and systems. Many businesses use both.

 

Q4: Can I use Google Drive for my business?

Yes, but only the Enterprise tier of Google Workspace includes the security and compliance controls most businesses need. Lower tiers are better suited to small teams.

 

Q5: What’s a reasonable budget for enterprise file sharing?

Most cloud platforms charge $10 to $25 per user per month for business-level plans. On-premises and hybrid options add infrastructure and maintenance costs on top of that.

Conclusion

The right enterprise file sharing solution depends on how a business needs to deploy, secure, and govern its files, not on which platform has the longest feature list. Teams that need Microsoft-native collaboration lean toward OneDrive and SharePoint. Businesses with strict data residency or infrastructure requirements look at on-premises and hybrid options like FileCloud, Egnyte, or i2Share. Client-facing workflows, automated transfers, and zero-knowledge encryption each point to a different specialist platform.

Whichever platform a business chooses, file sharing and backup solve different problems. Pairing a file sharing platform with an independent backup and recovery strategy protects against the incidents that sync and version history alone cannot fully address.

For businesses evaluating their data protection options alongside file sharing, Info2soft offers backup, replication, and disaster recovery solutions built for enterprise environments.

Emma is the bridge between complex engineering and the people who need it. As a content creator at Info2soft, she spends her days translating "tech-speak" into clear, actionable stories about data resilience. She’s not just documenting software; she's uncovering how data replication and recovery actually change the way businesses run.

More Related Articles

Ready to Enhance Business Data Security?

· Enterprise & Mid-market Customers Worldwide

· Support team available to assist you throughout your trial

· Start a 60-day free trial or view demo to see how Info2Soft protects enterprise data.

Please fill out the form and submit it, our customer service representative will contact you soon.
By submitting this form, I confirm that I have read and agree to the Privacy Notice.
{{ isSubmitting ? 'Submitting...' : 'Submit' }}