Info2soft use cookies to help you have a superior and more admissible browsing experience on our website. Privacy Policy
Loading...
Data synchronization projects have a reputation for turning calm planning meetings into standoffs.

The DBA insists the source database is off-limits. The project manager points to a fixed go-live date. Ops flags that the last full sync took seven hours and maxed out the CPU. Leadership calls for calm and pushes the launch to Monday.
For one technology team, this cycle repeated for months. The root cause wasn’t poor teamwork. It was three specific, recurring failures in how data was being synced.
These problems share a common cause: the sync method itself. There are three mainstream approaches to change data capture (CDC):
| CDC method | How it works | Drawback |
|---|---|---|
| Query-based | Polls the database at set intervals | High load, poor performance |
| Trigger-based | Adds triggers to capture changes | Interferes with the source system |
| Log-based | Reads logs the database already writes | Relies on database binary log support; log format differences across databases |
Log-based CDC solves the core problem: it captures changes without touching or slowing down the source system.
i2Stream is built on log-based CDC, and it maps directly onto the three pain points above.
In one pilot project—a dual-site, bidirectional data sync—the estimated two-week timeline dropped to two days.
i2Stream has also supported award-winning projects in healthcare and utilities:
Data synchronization looks like a small task, but it underpins everything downstream: reporting accuracy, migration timelines, system reliability. Get it wrong, and every team built on top of that data inherits the problem.
With the right CDC approach in place, sync stops being the bottleneck—and becomes just another solved problem.